|
|

|

RANGERS MID-TERM REPORT CARD
Friday - January 03, 2003
|
Rangers Mid-Term Report Card
|
| 2002-2003 Record: | 41GP
| 15-20-5-1 | 36PTS | 99GF | 129GA | |
| 2001-2002 Record: | 41GP
| 22-14-3-2 | 49PTS | 121GF | 115GA | |
| Player |
Stats |
Grade |
Comments |
| Dan Blackburn |
23GP
7-10-3
3.21
.889 |
D+ |
What, "C-"? Whatever, they're
close, anyway. It's always hard to give an honest assessment of Blackburn
because the "he's just 19" thing always creeps into my head. 19 years old
and backstopping a must-win-at-all-costs gang of misfits and mercenaries
through 18 straight games is no walk in the park. But the Rangers don't
get a one goal handicap each game for playing with a 19 year old goalie,
so Blackburn must be graded as anyone else on the team.
With that said, just look
at his numbers. Of course he's playing behind a team hardly noted for their
defensive prowess, but sorry, 3.21 and .889 is horrendous, near the bottom
of the 50-some goalies on record this season. And, quite honestly, it's
not like the defense was bad every night, Blackburn just couldn't
stop much of anything in the last 2-3 weeks of his 18 game run, both his
fault and the fault of the coaches who didn't give him a rest in a busy
schedule. Now, with Dunham in the picture, the schedule lighter and the
Rangers needing lots of wins in a hurry, Blackburn hasn't seen the ice
since Dunham arrived, and I wouldn't be surprised if he got 5 starts the
rest of the season. I don't think he's eligable at 19 years old, but the
minors would probably be the best place for Dan right now. Night after
night of work to fix those bad areas in his game, like dropping too early
and freezing up on breakaways. |
| Mike Dunham |
8GP
3-4-1
2.63
.913 |
B+ |
The Pittsburgh game was
a clunker, and I missed the Tampa Bay game where he surrendered 5, but
otherwise Dunham has been somewhere between "steady" and "superb" every
night out there. Like I said in Blackburn's column, look at these
numbers. A .913 save percentage would put him in the top-10 of the league
were it not for his early season stats in Nashville. In fact, in Mike Richter's
entire career he's only posted a save percentage higher than .913
once! Dunham has a great attitude and loves being a Ranger, his skills
are still at their peak at 30 years old and he holds the Rangers in just
about every game he plays. Folks, we've got a very good goalie here, perhaps
the best one we've had since Richter's 96-97 season, so I don't want to
hear about Tomas Kloucek! If this team can improve around him, Dunham
can easily take the Rangers into the playoffs and beyond. |
| Mike Richter |
13GP
5-6-1
2.94
.897 |
? |
Honestly, it's hard to remember
with much detail how Richter played back in October. There were some good
nights, especially the game in Toronto, and there were some bad nights.
And in light of his season ending concussion it's not really worth it to
grade Richter's 13 games, is it? |
|
|
|
|
| Joel Bouchard |
10GP
3-1-4
+2
4PIM
18:55 |
B |
One of the bigger surprises
of the season, journeyman defenseman Joel Bouchard gets called up during
the outbreak of Ranger defensive injuries and probably plays better than
any other d-man on the team in that time! Defensively he's nothing to write
mom about, but on the offensive side he's surprisingly talented. Has a
good knack for knowing when to jump into the play, pretty good skater and
has a hard, accurate shot. Go figure. It will be interesting to see what
becomes of Bouchard when some of the regulars return. |
| Cory Cross |
5GP
0-0-0
-2
6PIM
15:41 |
n/a |
Not enough info for a grade,
and not much to say about him in five games. He's looked both good and
bad. Some people have been jumping on his case already, but give him a
break, one game in Hartford and five with the Rangers is the only hockey
he's played since last April. |
| Dave Karpa |
15GP
0-0-0
-4
14PIM
14:39 |
B/D- |
The "B" is for Karpa's few
games as a 4th line winger, a position I thought he was surprisingly decent
at. He got shots off, threw some big hits on the forecheck and didn't look
near as lost as Dvorak or Samuelsson. But as a defenseman he still sucks.
A testiment to his suckiness on defense is the fact that Trottier has been
playing borderline-NHL'ers Cross, Lintner and Bouchard over Karpa lately. |
| Darius Kasparaitis |
40GP
1-7-8
-15
40PIM
19:21 |
D- |
Here's the good thing I
have to say about Darius. In a between periods interview in the Rangers
day-after-Christmas game, Kasparaitis was asked what he did on the holiday.
He replied that he sat around with his girlfriend and played "BMX XXX"
on the Xbox, which is pretty funny since "BMX XXX" on the Xbox is a low-brow
type of game with lots of dick and fart jokes and the goal in the game
is to unlock cut-scenes of stripper video. That Darius sure is a character.
And like I said, that's the only good thing I have to say about him. |
| Brian Leetch |
28GP
4-11-15
+4
14PIM
25:56 |
B |
I've got to give it up for
Leetch here, someone I've traditionally killed in these report cards in
the three seasons I've been doing them. The defense fell apart when he
went down with mysterious (read: broken) bruised foot injury. Not like
the defense was a fortress with Leetch in it, but it has been noticably
worse since he's been gone. It's funny, too, because his offensive instincts
seem at their lowest point in his career. He just does not have the speed,
the moves nor the shot he once had, even as recently as last season, but
it's Leetch's defensive game which has taken a noticable step up. He's
still not tough enough around his own net, but positionally, which has
been Leetch's downfall in so many past seasons, he's been excellent. Keep
in mind, though, that Leetch usually has a strong first half to every
season and then self-destructs in the second half, but hopefully his bruised/broken/shattered/missing
foot injury has provided him with enough rest to have a strong second half. |
| Sylvain Lefebvre |
32GP
0-2-2
-8
10PIM
15:43 |
C |
In typical Lefebvre fashion
he's just there, doing his job to varying results, don't mind him. I'm
surprised to see the -8 because I thought he's been pretty steady this
season, but that is the second worst +/- among the d-men. I think
he's been a little more physical than in prior seasons, but maybe I'm hallucinating.
Whatever. It makes no sense for Lefebvre-haters to complain about him now
because he's half a season from never being a Ranger again. |
| Richard Lintner |
7GP
1-0-1
-3
0PIM
13:49 |
C+ |
And I thought finding things
to say about Lefevbre was difficult. Hah! Lintner has been out there, you
know, playing hockey, but, umm, I... I... he's uhhh, you know, he's been
decent. |
| Vladimir Malakhov |
41GP
2-10-12
-2
26PIM
22:01 |
C+ |
Yeah yeah yeah. You know
this story already, because it's the only story he's ever had. Half the
time he plays like an all-star, half the time he seems to be out there
wondering if he remembered to set his VCR to tape West Wing tonight. I
was thinking "B-" here, but it occured to me that he's been significantly
less fiesty this season compared to last, where he rang up 83 penalty minutes. |
| Tom Poti |
40GP
5-25-30
-5
40PIM
25:16 |
C+ |
A tale of two Poti's. Poti
#1, the guy who we saw for about the first 20-25 games, was probably the
best offensive defensemen in the league during that stretch, and his defense
was quietly effective on most nights. Poti #2, the one we've had for about
the past month, seems to have lost his offensive instincts and can't do
much right on the defensive side. So you take 20 games at about an "A-"
level, 20 games at about a "D+" level, and come up with a "C+" for the
first half. Sound about right? For the people who think Poti is the worst
thing to happen since Randy Moeller, keep in mind that half of Poti's points
have come on special teams, and -5 at even strength isn't that bad
on a team that's been outscored by 30 goals, especially considering Poti's
ice time. Also keep in mind that while it's not a crowd pleaser, an open
ice poke check is more effective and less risky than an open ice hit any
day. |
| Dale Purinton |
32GP
3-7-10
-1
63PIM
15:56 |
B- |
While he's been one of the
best stories on the Rangers this season, that tells you more about the
Rangers disappointing season than anything else. You bet, he's improved
immensely as a defenseman compared to his prior seasons. But, c'mon, he
hasn't been that good. Yes, he has been one of the better
defensemen... on a team that leads the league in goals against. While it's
a great story for Purinton, in essence what the Rangers got was a 7th defenseman
who's now playing like a 4th or 5th. Granted, it is one of the very
few positives this team has produced since October. |
|
|
|
|
| Matthew Barnaby |
38GP
4-8-12
even
77PIM
12:17 |
B- |
He's been all over
the lineup, from first line to fourth line and back, and has had both his
good and bad moments. 4 goals isn't enough goals even for Barnaby, and
it's frustrating how every tenth game he shows some great offensive skills
and you don't see them again for a month. But, still, no one expects him
to turn into a Tkachuk at this stage of his career, and Barnaby is still
a very effective agitator and, uh, life-injector into his team. He's one
of the few players on this team who'd be more than willing to take an elbow
to the teeth or a stick across the forearm to score a goal, and the Rangers
better not give that up. |
| Pavel Bure |
27GP
14-7-21
+7
8PIM
19:40 |
B |
Bure's season has broken
down into four very distinct segments. First segment was a mysterious strep
throat that kept him out of the first few games, which not-so-coincidentally
coincided with a knee injury towards the end of pre-season. Then he came
back, was on fire, everyone was in love. Then he slumped and everyone wanted
a divorce. Now he's in segment #4 and knee(s) injury #2. Say what you will
about Bure, but the Rangers need him back oh so desperately. They have
none, not a single one player on the team who's a consistent goal scorer
beyond Pavel. |
| Ted Donato |
20GP
1-0-1
+1
2PIM
6:56 |
C+ |
He's a reasonably effective
3rd/4th line defensive-minded center, but I like the move to replace Donato
with Tibbetts. Ted's a solid, safe player, but doesn't stand out in any
single area of the game I can think of. The Rangers don't have a dynamic
enough roster where they need solid and safe. They need impact. |
| Radek Dvorak |
36GP
4-11-15
-8
10PIM
16:04 |
F |
If there's one thing I appreciate
about the way Dvorak has played this season, it's been that his play has
been so godawful putrid that I've found new depths of hate for a player's
game within myself that I never knew I was possible of reaching. It's kind
of inspiring in a way. Nothing, ABSOLUTELY NOTHING do I like about Dvorak's
game. Trottier nailed it square on the head when he called
Dvorak a "chicken" in so many words, but it turns out that Trottier is
a chicken himself by constantly covering up for his candor about Dvorak
ever since then. Radek Dvorak is a chicken. I'm hard pressed to
remember a player who tried to avoid traffic and getting hit every single
second of every single shift like Dvorak does. He will never, not ever,
go to the net. He'll pass the puck anywhere as soon as someone is bearing
down on him. He constantly tries to intercept puck along the boards away
from the action instead of going into the corners and getting it himself.
And since being called out by Trottier he hasn't changed his game a whit
but for one or two shifts. The fact that so much ice time goes to this
black hole of a player is one of the things that has been killing the Rangers,
and the sooner he's gone the better off this team will be. Usually I feel
a little bad in giving a player a low grade. I give Dvorak an "F" with
gusto, like a drunken pirate. |
| Gordie Dwyer |
7GP
0-0-0
-2
26PIM
6:52 |
B |
Bright red hair, more than
willing to throw a hit or get into a fight, classic hockey name, who doesn't
like The Gordie? I'd probably choke to death on my own tongue if he ever
scored a goal, but he's not here for goals, he's here for 4th line energy
and grit. And he's provided it quite nicely. |
| Rico Fata |
21GP
1-3-4
even
4PIM
6:47 |
D+ |
Ah, Rico. "Freakin' Rico",
I like to call him, not to be confused with "Freakin' Chico", the Devils
TV broadcaster. They both have "freakin'"'s in front of their names because
it's a handy time saver. "Freakin' Rico" for his ability to skate 5.7 miles
per game and not get anything accomplished, and "Freakin' Chico" for the
puzzling things that come out of his mouth during a broadcast, like Barney
the Dinosaur on quaaludes. Yeah, Freakin' Rico has played pretty well his
last two games, and surely hell froze over and monkeys flew out of butts
when he scored his first NHL goal in 9,000 attempts. But he's still Freakin'
Rico until he does these things a little more often. |
| Bobby Holik |
23GP
4-7-11
-4
22PIM
17:15 |
C+ |
Since coming back from injury
his game has really been more of a "B" level, but before the injury (actually,
during it, it turns out), Holik was a shell of the unibrowed monster we
had to deal with on New Jersey all the time. His comments are still as
pointed and revealing as ever, but they seem to have no effect on a team
that's likely split into several different factions in the locker room.
And while Holik's sub-par play is surely a lot of his own fault, Trottier
has misused him from day one. He's a checking... center! He's not
a first line center, although with the Rangers decimated lineup that's
not a bad idea right now, he's not a wing, he's not an offensive player.
At ALL. Never was. Never will be. He's the guy you say to, "You see <top
center on opposing team> over there? I want you in his pockets all night
long", and Bobby Holik can do that with the best of them. Even though he
hasn't been up to expectations so far I'm still happy to have him. Makes
the game more interesting at the very least. |
| Eric Lindros |
40GP
11-12-23
-2
79PIM
20:16 |
B- |
I might be one of the only
people who think Lindros is having a decent season. Certainly not great,
his scoring is down a bit, but for the most part he's been twice as rugged
and mean and nasty as he was last season, and that's great to see. How
much scoring do you want from him, I mean, look at the wingers on this
team! Sure, he played an awful lot with Bure, but those two have absolutely
no chemistry together this season for whatever reason. Give Eric credit,
too, because he's been playing with a target on his back this season. I
know, it sounds childish to assume the referees are targeting a certain
player, but I'd bet my left nugget that it's true. Half the times Lindros
knocks someone over in ANY of the three zones it's a penalty. A player
trips in front of him and Lindros braces himself against the boards so
he doesn't crush the guy and it's a game misconduct and a suspension. So,
he's had that to deal with, the lack of talented wingers on this team and
a period of intense spotlight during a scoring drought, and I think
he's come through it fine. I'm not saying he has the scoring touch like
last season because he doesn't, but he still makes great passes that never
get converted and has been playing like a bull. He could play better, they
ALL could, but Lindros isn't the problem. |
| Jamie Lundmark |
17GP
0-1-1
-7
4PIM
11:59 |
D |
Hey, I'd rather not give
Lundmark a "D", either, but what else should he get? Through all the moaning
I do about the lack of production from certain players, they've all (even
Freakin' Rico) scored something. Jamie has scored nothing,
and now he's back in Hartford for the second time this season. His first
stint with the team he at least looked pretty good. He was in the play,
getting shots off, but in his very brief second stint he was totally flat
and unnoticable. He's not there yet, the NHL game in regular season still
seems a step ahead of Lundmark's abilities. People will makes excuses,
but face the facts: 17 games, a reasonable 12 minutes of ice time per with
no goals and one assist; well, that stinks. |
| Sandy McCarthy |
41GP
1-4-5
-5
56PIM
6:50 |
D+ |
Okay, what does McCarthy
do, exactly? Granted, with the ice time he's given there's only so much
he can do, but the reputation throughout his career that he dogs it through
a lot of games certainly hasn't changed here. Once in a while he'll play
a great 4th line game - hitting, skating hard, crashing the net - but that
happens about once in every five games, if not fewer. |
| Mark Messier |
39GP
12-7-19
-5
20PIM
18:37 |
C- |
I don't want to take anything
away from his surprising 12 goals on the season, but honestly, he flat
out walked into half of them. Puck riccochets like a pinball through
players skates and winds up at Messier on the side of the net, who taps
it in. Still, though, if I were grading him after the first 20 games he'd
probably get a "B-" to a "B", but lately there hasn't been much gas in
the tank. And it's absoultely mind boggling how he's put out there in every
situation and crucial spot in the game, but that's not really Messier's
fault. Or is it? Can we make him a 7 minute per game power play specialist
the rest of the season and let him walk off on a decent note? I bet we
can't. |
| Petr Nedved |
41GP
12-14-26
-11
36PIM
20:34 |
C+ |
There's been much talk of
Petr "stepping up" this season, but that's gone completely flat lately.
He still may hustle and try harder than most others, and his assessments
of his own play and the play of his team is second only to Holik's in honesty
and accuracy, but the Rangers need Nedved to produce, too, and the
production line has been on strike lately. But let's also look at what
Nedved's done well this season. Trottier has made him the #1 center on
the team for all intents and purposes, and he's done a decent job at it.
Crucial late game faceoffs and shifts, penalty kills and so on, Nedved
has been in bigger spots more than any other forward on the team. Back
to the downside, his scoring hasn't been consistent all season long and
he has the second worst +/- on the entire team. So, I'm sure you get the
jist of what I'm saying here, it's been both good and bad for Petr this
season. |
| Ronald Petrovicky |
36GP
4-6-10
-7
52PIM
14:00 |
C+ |
Everyone loves Petro. He
hits hard, he hustles, he's gritty, you can become a life long fan favorite
in NY on those skills alone. But let's not gloss his entire game over,
either. Petro is rather inept offensively, is no defensive wunderkind and
does take a decent share of games off himself. He's a fish out of water
as a 1st/2nd liner on Trottier's team. Grit is all well and good, but people
getting 14 minutes per game need to score a little more than 4 goals, too.
I'd probably be giving him a "B" if he was a 4th liner, so here's
yet another out of place player in Trottier's scheme. |
| Mikael Samuelsson |
41GP
6-10-16
-7
24PIM
15:45 |
D |
After a promising start
to his season where it looked like Samuelsson was going to take a step
to the next level and become a solid 2nd/3rd line NHL'er, he's completely
and totally fallen flat on his face. Everything he was doing well at the
beginning of the season - driving to the net, playing with some snarl,
getting shots off, making moves, just trying to make an impact on every
shift - has totally disappeared. He went through an entire two months
of hockey without being noticable! That's bad. He's also become incredibly
prone to turnovers in his own zone, or at the opponent's blue line. It's
just gotten real bad for Samuelsson, but since he's unlikely to go anywhere
on this talent starved roster let's just hope he turns it around. |
| Billy Tibbetts |
8GP
0-0-0
-1
10PIM
9:44 |
B |
Where other players like
Petrovicky got a slightly lower grade for the position they were erroneously
put in by Trottier, Tibbetts actually gets a higher grade than if he was
a 2nd or 3rd line player. He's a 4th line center, probably no better, probably
no worse, and has done a very good 4th line center's job. He hits often,
skates decently, sets up some decent plays (but also has an occasional
case of fumbleitis with the puck), works hard and can throw the punches.
For those still lamenting the loss of Ian Lapierierre, Tibbetts is
Lapierierre, albeit a slightly lower rent version. His legendary lack of
discipline has also not been a problem so far. |
| Dixon Ward |
8GP
0-0-0
-2
2PIM
8:44 |
D |
Yeah, Dixon Ward. Remember
him? Tore it up in the Rangers Vermont training camp, had a good enough
pre-season to make the team and really hasn't done squat since. You may
be saying to yourself, "Hey Rocha, how come the stats for Ward, Dwyer and
Tibbetts are eerily similar yet the latter two get "B"'s while Ward gets
a "D"?". Well, Dwyer and Tibbetts, they hit, fight and hustle. They provide
a necessary 4th line component this team has been lacking forever. Tell
me, what did Ward provide? |
|
|
|
|
| COACHING STAFF: |
|
D- |
The only thing that saved
Trottier from an "F", and let's be fair here, while injuries are never
an excuse for losing, Trottier has had to deal with some mighty big injuries
on this team. The #1 goalie, the #1 defenseman and the #1 scorer, all gone
for major portions of the season. But... that's it with the breaks. Almost
everything else Trottier has done, I haven't liked. Okay, there's always
that, "what if he's saying the right things but the players aren't listening?".
Well, how do players listen? How do teams win? Some coaches seem
to do it. I don't know what it takes to get players to listen to you, but
I do know a crappy team when I see it, and that's Trottier's Rangers.
The laundry list of errors
is too long to go through, but I'll just throw some out from the top of
my head: Too much reliance on Messier, line combinations that defy logic,
sticking with the Petro-Nedved-Dvorak line forever even though they haven't
been great as a line in what seems like years, overplaying Blackburn, not
doing anything about the awful play of Dvorak, Kasparaitis and Samuelsson,
not having the commitment to stick with a 4 line, hard hitting roster/line
make up, even though that's how the Rangers have played some of their best
games of the season, backing down after the stand he took in Columbus by
banishing Oliwa, backing down on the dead-on criticism he had of Dvorak,
trying to present too much of a positive attitude when the players seem
to need discipline more than anything, not having any sort of neutral zone
system, and so on, and so on... |
|
|
|
|
| OVERALL: |
|
D |
I'm sure most people are
screaming for an "F", but I have to give them some sort of break
for injuries, and like I mentioned in Trottier's column, they've been major
ones. It's not an excuse for what is shaping up to be one of the worst
Ranger teams in this miserable six-season slide, but you've got to be fair
and ease up on the hammer just a little.
Everyone has their theories;
it's Messier, it's Trottier, it's Sather, it's Dolan, it's lack of familiarity,
it's lack of a system, it's the corporate structure, it's Manfred Mann's
Earth Band. Here's my theory: it's the sea. The rolling, relentless sea
has claimed braver heroes than the Rangers in it's briny depths. What else
am I gonna say? Yeah, it's everything mentioned above and a bag of chips,
too. The goaltending hasn't been very good until Dunham arrived, very few
players have been stepping up, the Rangers lack of a defensive system (other
than "backchecking", like that's a system!) has been killing them, the
refereeing has stunk, and so on, and so on. Funny thing, though, while
this team has turned me off like very few other Ranger teams have, I still
think they can make the playoffs. That's not based on some dopey Romper
Room-esque grasping at the sun coming out tomorrow, but based on a bit
of logic. They have good goaltending now. When Bure comes back the offensive
takes a big step forward. When Leetch comes back the defense becomes a
lot more settled. Their schedule is much lighter, while everyone else's
in the East gets heavier. Eh, it could happen. But it probably won't. |
|
|
|
|
| Didn't play enough to warrant
comment: |
|
|
Josh Green (3GP)
Johan Holmqvist (1GP)
Roman Lyashenko (1GP)
Kryztof Oliwa (9GP, no ice
time, banished to minors, nothing else really to say) |
| created by: |
|
|
Pete Rocha, © 2002.
procha@optonline.net |
|
|
|
Discuss
the card here |
Posted by pete at January 03, 2003 02:47 PM eMail this entry!
Excellent, as usual and I agree with everything you wrote. Also very much agree with your analysis of Lindros. He may not be racking up the points, but he isn't afraid to throw his body around either. And I'm relieved to see that I'm not the only one who noticed the bullseye on the back of his shirt.
BTW, you did say my left nugget, didn't you???
HEHEHEHEHEHEHE :-D
very eloquent.... I must say
|

|


|