Home
The Hockey Rodent
Rangerland
Messageboard
Birdcage
Archives
Buy Hockeybird Stuff !

RSS Feed

Podcast




RANGERS MID-TERM REPORT CARD
Friday - January 03, 2003
 
 
 
Rangers Mid-Term Report Card
2002-2003 Record: | 41GP | 15-20-5-1 | 36PTS |  99GF | 129GA | 
2001-2002 Record: | 41GP | 22-14-3-2 | 49PTS | 121GF | 115GA |
Player Stats Grade Comments
Dan Blackburn 23GP
7-10-3
3.21
.889
D+ What, "C-"? Whatever, they're close, anyway. It's always hard to give an honest assessment of Blackburn because the "he's just 19" thing always creeps into my head. 19 years old and backstopping a must-win-at-all-costs gang of misfits and mercenaries through 18 straight games is no walk in the park. But the Rangers don't get a one goal handicap each game for playing with a 19 year old goalie, so Blackburn must be graded as anyone else on the team.

With that said, just look at his numbers. Of course he's playing behind a team hardly noted for their defensive prowess, but sorry, 3.21 and .889 is horrendous, near the bottom of the 50-some goalies on record this season. And, quite honestly, it's not like the defense was bad every night, Blackburn just couldn't stop much of anything in the last 2-3 weeks of his 18 game run, both his fault and the fault of the coaches who didn't give him a rest in a busy schedule. Now, with Dunham in the picture, the schedule lighter and the Rangers needing lots of wins in a hurry, Blackburn hasn't seen the ice since Dunham arrived, and I wouldn't be surprised if he got 5 starts the rest of the season. I don't think he's eligable at 19 years old, but the minors would probably be the best place for Dan right now. Night after night of work to fix those bad areas in his game, like dropping too early and freezing up on breakaways.

Mike Dunham 8GP
3-4-1
2.63
.913
B+ The Pittsburgh game was a clunker, and I missed the Tampa Bay game where he surrendered 5, but otherwise Dunham has been somewhere between "steady" and "superb" every night out there. Like I said in Blackburn's column, look at these numbers. A .913 save percentage would put him in the top-10 of the league were it not for his early season stats in Nashville. In fact, in Mike Richter's entire career he's only posted a save percentage higher than .913 once! Dunham has a great attitude and loves being a Ranger, his skills are still at their peak at 30 years old and he holds the Rangers in just about every game he plays. Folks, we've got a very good goalie here, perhaps the best one we've had since Richter's 96-97 season, so I don't want to hear about Tomas Kloucek! If this team can improve around him, Dunham can easily take the Rangers into the playoffs and beyond.
Mike Richter 13GP
5-6-1
2.94
.897
? Honestly, it's hard to remember with much detail how Richter played back in October. There were some good nights, especially the game in Toronto, and there were some bad nights. And in light of his season ending concussion it's not really worth it to grade Richter's 13 games, is it?
Joel Bouchard 10GP
3-1-4
+2
4PIM
18:55
B One of the bigger surprises of the season, journeyman defenseman Joel Bouchard gets called up during the outbreak of Ranger defensive injuries and probably plays better than any other d-man on the team in that time! Defensively he's nothing to write mom about, but on the offensive side he's surprisingly talented. Has a good knack for knowing when to jump into the play, pretty good skater and has a hard, accurate shot. Go figure. It will be interesting to see what becomes of Bouchard when some of the regulars return.
Cory Cross 5GP
0-0-0
-2
6PIM
15:41
n/a Not enough info for a grade, and not much to say about him in five games. He's looked both good and bad. Some people have been jumping on his case already, but give him a break, one game in Hartford and five with the Rangers is the only hockey he's played since last April.
Dave Karpa 15GP
0-0-0
-4
14PIM
14:39
B/D- The "B" is for Karpa's few games as a 4th line winger, a position I thought he was surprisingly decent at. He got shots off, threw some big hits on the forecheck and didn't look near as lost as Dvorak or Samuelsson. But as a defenseman he still sucks. A testiment to his suckiness on defense is the fact that Trottier has been playing borderline-NHL'ers Cross, Lintner and Bouchard over Karpa lately.
Darius Kasparaitis 40GP
1-7-8
-15
40PIM
19:21
D- Here's the good thing I have to say about Darius. In a between periods interview in the Rangers day-after-Christmas game, Kasparaitis was asked what he did on the holiday. He replied that he sat around with his girlfriend and played "BMX XXX" on the Xbox, which is pretty funny since "BMX XXX" on the Xbox is a low-brow type of game with lots of dick and fart jokes and the goal in the game is to unlock cut-scenes of stripper video. That Darius sure is a character. And like I said, that's the only good thing I have to say about him.
Brian Leetch 28GP
4-11-15
+4
14PIM
25:56
B I've got to give it up for Leetch here, someone I've traditionally killed in these report cards in the three seasons I've been doing them. The defense fell apart when he went down with mysterious (read: broken) bruised foot injury. Not like the defense was a fortress with Leetch in it, but it has been noticably worse since he's been gone. It's funny, too, because his offensive instincts seem at their lowest point in his career. He just does not have the speed, the moves nor the shot he once had, even as recently as last season, but it's Leetch's defensive game which has taken a noticable step up. He's still not tough enough around his own net, but positionally, which has been Leetch's downfall in so many past seasons, he's been excellent. Keep in mind, though, that Leetch usually has a strong first half to every season and then self-destructs in the second half, but hopefully his bruised/broken/shattered/missing foot injury has provided him with enough rest to have a strong second half.
Sylvain Lefebvre 32GP
0-2-2
-8
10PIM
15:43
C In typical Lefebvre fashion he's just there, doing his job to varying results, don't mind him. I'm surprised to see the -8 because I thought he's been pretty steady this season, but that is the second worst +/- among the d-men. I think he's been a little more physical than in prior seasons, but maybe I'm hallucinating. Whatever. It makes no sense for Lefebvre-haters to complain about him now because he's half a season from never being a Ranger again. 
Richard Lintner 7GP
1-0-1
-3
0PIM
13:49
C+ And I thought finding things to say about Lefevbre was difficult. Hah! Lintner has been out there, you know, playing hockey, but, umm, I... I... he's uhhh, you know, he's been decent.
Vladimir Malakhov 41GP
2-10-12
-2
26PIM
22:01
C+ Yeah yeah yeah. You know this story already, because it's the only story he's ever had. Half the time he plays like an all-star, half the time he seems to be out there wondering if he remembered to set his VCR to tape West Wing tonight. I was thinking "B-" here, but it occured to me that he's been significantly less fiesty this season compared to last, where he rang up 83 penalty minutes.
Tom Poti 40GP
5-25-30
-5
40PIM
25:16
C+ A tale of two Poti's. Poti #1, the guy who we saw for about the first 20-25 games, was probably the best offensive defensemen in the league during that stretch, and his defense was quietly effective on most nights. Poti #2, the one we've had for about the past month, seems to have lost his offensive instincts and can't do much right on the defensive side. So you take 20 games at about an "A-" level, 20 games at about a "D+" level, and come up with a "C+" for the first half. Sound about right? For the people who think Poti is the worst thing to happen since Randy Moeller, keep in mind that half of Poti's points have come on special teams, and -5 at even strength isn't that bad on a team that's been outscored by 30 goals, especially considering Poti's ice time. Also keep in mind that while it's not a crowd pleaser, an open ice poke check is more effective and less risky than an open ice hit any day.
Dale Purinton 32GP
3-7-10
-1
63PIM
15:56
B- While he's been one of the best stories on the Rangers this season, that tells you more about the Rangers disappointing season than anything else. You bet, he's improved immensely as a defenseman compared to his prior seasons. But, c'mon, he hasn't been that good. Yes, he has been one of the better defensemen... on a team that leads the league in goals against. While it's a great story for Purinton, in essence what the Rangers got was a 7th defenseman who's now playing like a 4th or 5th. Granted, it is one of the very few positives this team has produced since October.
Matthew Barnaby 38GP
4-8-12
even
77PIM
12:17
B- He's been all over the lineup, from first line to fourth line and back, and has had both his good and bad moments. 4 goals isn't enough goals even for Barnaby, and it's frustrating how every tenth game he shows some great offensive skills and you don't see them again for a month. But, still, no one expects him to turn into a Tkachuk at this stage of his career, and Barnaby is still a very effective agitator and, uh, life-injector into his team. He's one of the few players on this team who'd be more than willing to take an elbow to the teeth or a stick across the forearm to score a goal, and the Rangers better not give that up.
Pavel Bure 27GP
14-7-21
+7
8PIM
19:40
B Bure's season has broken down into four very distinct segments. First segment was a mysterious strep throat that kept him out of the first few games, which not-so-coincidentally coincided with a knee injury towards the end of pre-season. Then he came back, was on fire, everyone was in love. Then he slumped and everyone wanted a divorce. Now he's in segment #4 and knee(s) injury #2. Say what you will about Bure, but the Rangers need him back oh so desperately. They have none, not a single one player on the team who's a consistent goal scorer beyond Pavel.
Ted Donato 20GP
1-0-1
+1
2PIM
6:56
C+ He's a reasonably effective 3rd/4th line defensive-minded center, but I like the move to replace Donato with Tibbetts. Ted's a solid, safe player, but doesn't stand out in any single area of the game I can think of. The Rangers don't have a dynamic enough roster where they need solid and safe. They need impact.
Radek Dvorak 36GP
4-11-15
-8
10PIM
16:04
F If there's one thing I appreciate about the way Dvorak has played this season, it's been that his play has been so godawful putrid that I've found new depths of hate for a player's game within myself that I never knew I was possible of reaching. It's kind of inspiring in a way. Nothing, ABSOLUTELY NOTHING do I like about Dvorak's game. Trottier nailed it square on the head when he called Dvorak a "chicken" in so many words, but it turns out that Trottier is a chicken himself by constantly covering up for his candor about Dvorak ever since then. Radek Dvorak is a chicken. I'm hard pressed to remember a player who tried to avoid traffic and getting hit every single second of every single shift like Dvorak does. He will never, not ever, go to the net. He'll pass the puck anywhere as soon as someone is bearing down on him. He constantly tries to intercept puck along the boards away from the action instead of going into the corners and getting it himself. And since being called out by Trottier he hasn't changed his game a whit but for one or two shifts. The fact that so much ice time goes to this black hole of a player is one of the things that has been killing the Rangers, and the sooner he's gone the better off this team will be. Usually I feel a little bad in giving a player a low grade. I give Dvorak an "F" with gusto, like a drunken pirate.
Gordie Dwyer 7GP
0-0-0
-2
26PIM
6:52
B Bright red hair, more than willing to throw a hit or get into a fight, classic hockey name, who doesn't like The Gordie? I'd probably choke to death on my own tongue if he ever scored a goal, but he's not here for goals, he's here for 4th line energy and grit. And he's provided it quite nicely.
Rico Fata 21GP
1-3-4
even
4PIM
6:47
D+ Ah, Rico. "Freakin' Rico", I like to call him, not to be confused with "Freakin' Chico", the Devils TV broadcaster. They both have "freakin'"'s in front of their names because it's a handy time saver. "Freakin' Rico" for his ability to skate 5.7 miles per game and not get anything accomplished, and "Freakin' Chico" for the puzzling things that come out of his mouth during a broadcast, like Barney the Dinosaur on quaaludes. Yeah, Freakin' Rico has played pretty well his last two games, and surely hell froze over and monkeys flew out of butts when he scored his first NHL goal in 9,000 attempts. But he's still Freakin' Rico until he does these things a little more often.
Bobby Holik 23GP
4-7-11
-4
22PIM
17:15
C+ Since coming back from injury his game has really been more of a "B" level, but before the injury (actually, during it, it turns out), Holik was a shell of the unibrowed monster we had to deal with on New Jersey all the time. His comments are still as pointed and revealing as ever, but they seem to have no effect on a team that's likely split into several different factions in the locker room. And while Holik's sub-par play is surely a lot of his own fault, Trottier has misused him from day one. He's a checking... center! He's not a first line center, although with the Rangers decimated lineup that's not a bad idea right now, he's not a wing, he's not an offensive player. At ALL. Never was. Never will be. He's the guy you say to, "You see <top center on opposing team> over there? I want you in his pockets all night long", and Bobby Holik can do that with the best of them. Even though he hasn't been up to expectations so far I'm still happy to have him. Makes the game more interesting at the very least.
Eric Lindros 40GP
11-12-23
-2
79PIM
20:16
B- I might be one of the only people who think Lindros is having a decent season. Certainly not great, his scoring is down a bit, but for the most part he's been twice as rugged and mean and nasty as he was last season, and that's great to see. How much scoring do you want from him, I mean, look at the wingers on this team! Sure, he played an awful lot with Bure, but those two have absolutely no chemistry together this season for whatever reason. Give Eric credit, too, because he's been playing with a target on his back this season. I know, it sounds childish to assume the referees are targeting a certain player, but I'd bet my left nugget that it's true. Half the times Lindros knocks someone over in ANY of the three zones it's a penalty. A player trips in front of him and Lindros braces himself against the boards so he doesn't crush the guy and it's a game misconduct and a suspension. So, he's had that to deal with, the lack of talented wingers on this team and a period of intense spotlight during a scoring drought, and I think he's come through it fine. I'm not saying he has the scoring touch like last season because he doesn't, but he still makes great passes that never get converted and has been playing like a bull. He could play better, they ALL could, but Lindros isn't the problem.
Jamie Lundmark 17GP
0-1-1
-7
4PIM
11:59
D Hey, I'd rather not give Lundmark a "D", either, but what else should he get? Through all the moaning I do about the lack of production from certain players, they've all (even Freakin' Rico) scored something. Jamie has scored nothing, and now he's back in Hartford for the second time this season. His first stint with the team he at least looked pretty good. He was in the play, getting shots off, but in his very brief second stint he was totally flat and unnoticable. He's not there yet, the NHL game in regular season still seems a step ahead of Lundmark's abilities. People will makes excuses, but face the facts: 17 games, a reasonable 12 minutes of ice time per with no goals and one assist; well, that stinks.
Sandy McCarthy 41GP
1-4-5
-5
56PIM
6:50
D+ Okay, what does McCarthy do, exactly? Granted, with the ice time he's given there's only so much he can do, but the reputation throughout his career that he dogs it through a lot of games certainly hasn't changed here. Once in a while he'll play a great 4th line game - hitting, skating hard, crashing the net - but that happens about once in every five games, if not fewer.
Mark Messier 39GP
12-7-19
-5
20PIM
18:37
C- I don't want to take anything away from his surprising 12 goals on the season, but honestly, he flat out walked into half of them. Puck riccochets like a pinball through players skates and winds up at Messier on the side of the net, who taps it in. Still, though, if I were grading him after the first 20 games he'd probably get a "B-" to a "B", but lately there hasn't been much gas in the tank. And it's absoultely mind boggling how he's put out there in every situation and crucial spot in the game, but that's not really Messier's fault. Or is it? Can we make him a 7 minute per game power play specialist the rest of the season and let him walk off on a decent note? I bet we can't.
Petr Nedved 41GP
12-14-26
-11
36PIM
20:34
C+ There's been much talk of Petr "stepping up" this season, but that's gone completely flat lately. He still may hustle and try harder than most others, and his assessments of his own play and the play of his team is second only to Holik's in honesty and accuracy, but the Rangers need Nedved to produce, too, and the production line has been on strike lately. But let's also look at what Nedved's done well this season. Trottier has made him the #1 center on the team for all intents and purposes, and he's done a decent job at it. Crucial late game faceoffs and shifts, penalty kills and so on, Nedved has been in bigger spots more than any other forward on the team. Back to the downside, his scoring hasn't been consistent all season long and he has the second worst +/- on the entire team. So, I'm sure you get the jist of what I'm saying here, it's been both good and bad for Petr this season.
Ronald Petrovicky 36GP
4-6-10
-7
52PIM
14:00
C+ Everyone loves Petro. He hits hard, he hustles, he's gritty, you can become a life long fan favorite in NY on those skills alone. But let's not gloss his entire game over, either. Petro is rather inept offensively, is no defensive wunderkind and does take a decent share of games off himself. He's a fish out of water as a 1st/2nd liner on Trottier's team. Grit is all well and good, but people getting 14 minutes per game need to score a little more than 4 goals, too. I'd probably be giving him a "B" if he was a 4th liner, so here's yet another out of place player in Trottier's scheme.
Mikael Samuelsson 41GP
6-10-16
-7
24PIM
15:45
D After a promising start to his season where it looked like Samuelsson was going to take a step to the next level and become a solid 2nd/3rd line NHL'er, he's completely and totally fallen flat on his face. Everything he was doing well at the beginning of the season - driving to the net, playing with some snarl, getting shots off, making moves, just trying to make an impact on every shift - has totally disappeared. He went through an entire two months of hockey without being noticable! That's bad. He's also become incredibly prone to turnovers in his own zone, or at the opponent's blue line. It's just gotten real bad for Samuelsson, but since he's unlikely to go anywhere on this talent starved roster let's just hope he turns it around.
Billy Tibbetts 8GP
0-0-0
-1
10PIM
9:44
B Where other players like Petrovicky got a slightly lower grade for the position they were erroneously put in by Trottier, Tibbetts actually gets a higher grade than if he was a 2nd or 3rd line player. He's a 4th line center, probably no better, probably no worse, and has done a very good 4th line center's job. He hits often, skates decently, sets up some decent plays (but also has an occasional case of fumbleitis with the puck), works hard and can throw the punches. For those still lamenting the loss of Ian Lapierierre, Tibbetts is Lapierierre, albeit a slightly lower rent version. His legendary lack of discipline has also not been a problem so far.
Dixon Ward 8GP
0-0-0
-2
2PIM
8:44
D Yeah, Dixon Ward. Remember him? Tore it up in the Rangers Vermont training camp, had a good enough pre-season to make the team and really hasn't done squat since. You may be saying to yourself, "Hey Rocha, how come the stats for Ward, Dwyer and Tibbetts are eerily similar yet the latter two get "B"'s while Ward gets a "D"?". Well, Dwyer and Tibbetts, they hit, fight and hustle. They provide a necessary 4th line component this team has been lacking forever. Tell me, what did Ward provide?
COACHING STAFF: D- The only thing that saved Trottier from an "F", and let's be fair here, while injuries are never an excuse for losing, Trottier has had to deal with some mighty big injuries on this team. The #1 goalie, the #1 defenseman and the #1 scorer, all gone for major portions of the season. But... that's it with the breaks. Almost everything else Trottier has done, I haven't liked. Okay, there's always that, "what if he's saying the right things but the players aren't listening?". Well, how do players listen? How do teams win? Some coaches seem to do it. I don't know what it takes to get players to listen to you, but I do know a crappy team when I see it, and that's Trottier's Rangers.

The laundry list of errors is too long to go through, but I'll just throw some out from the top of my head: Too much reliance on Messier, line combinations that defy logic, sticking with the Petro-Nedved-Dvorak line forever even though they haven't been great as a line in what seems like years, overplaying Blackburn, not doing anything about the awful play of Dvorak, Kasparaitis and Samuelsson, not having the commitment to stick with a 4 line, hard hitting roster/line make up, even though that's how the Rangers have played some of their best games of the season, backing down after the stand he took in Columbus by banishing Oliwa, backing down on the dead-on criticism he had of Dvorak, trying to present too much of a positive attitude when the players seem to need discipline more than anything, not having any sort of neutral zone system, and so on, and so on...

OVERALL: D I'm sure most people are screaming for an "F", but I have to give them some sort of break for injuries, and like I mentioned in Trottier's column, they've been major ones. It's not an excuse for what is shaping up to be one of the worst Ranger teams in this miserable six-season slide, but you've got to be fair and ease up on the hammer just a little.

Everyone has their theories; it's Messier, it's Trottier, it's Sather, it's Dolan, it's lack of familiarity, it's lack of a system, it's the corporate structure, it's Manfred Mann's Earth Band. Here's my theory: it's the sea. The rolling, relentless sea has claimed braver heroes than the Rangers in it's briny depths. What else am I gonna say? Yeah, it's everything mentioned above and a bag of chips, too. The goaltending hasn't been very good until Dunham arrived, very few players have been stepping up, the Rangers lack of a defensive system (other than "backchecking", like that's a system!) has been killing them, the refereeing has stunk, and so on, and so on. Funny thing, though, while this team has turned me off like very few other Ranger teams have, I still think they can make the playoffs. That's not based on some dopey Romper Room-esque grasping at the sun coming out tomorrow, but based on a bit of logic. They have good goaltending now. When Bure comes back the offensive takes a big step forward. When Leetch comes back the defense becomes a lot more settled. Their schedule is much lighter, while everyone else's in the East gets heavier. Eh, it could happen. But it probably won't.

Didn't play enough to warrant comment: Josh Green (3GP)
Johan Holmqvist (1GP)
Roman Lyashenko (1GP)
Kryztof Oliwa (9GP, no ice time, banished to minors, nothing else really to say)
created by: Pete Rocha, © 2002. procha@optonline.net
Discuss the card here
Posted by pete at January 03, 2003 02:47 PM
eMail this entry!
Comments

Excellent, as usual and I agree with everything you wrote. Also very much agree with your analysis of Lindros. He may not be racking up the points, but he isn't afraid to throw his body around either. And I'm relieved to see that I'm not the only one who noticed the bullseye on the back of his shirt.

Posted by: Tina on January 3, 2003 10:23 PM

BTW, you did say my left nugget, didn't you???
HEHEHEHEHEHEHE :-D

Posted by: Tina on January 3, 2003 10:25 PM

very eloquent.... I must say

Posted by: overtime89 on January 4, 2003 03:20 AM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


Comments:






Hockeybird Store !


 
Web Hockeybird.com