![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
||||
|
|
|
![]() |
|
||||
|
|
Ranger-centric Rumors
Friday - July 11, 2003
Anyone else squirming when they read media rumors The "rumors" are the equivalent of a pregnant yak sitting EJ Hradek reported on ESPN that Cujo is destined for the Hey EJ - see the guy smoking a bowl in the corner? That's Mike John Dellapina writes in the NY Daily News that trading Lindros Hey John - if Lindros goes, I count Holik and Nedved. Great These rumors have no sense of a Rangers perspective. First of all, all of the players in this high priced game of The Rangers already have prominent new faces brought in at the So, I will act as Sather's PR staff and offer a Ranger-centric Ranger-Centric Rumor #1 Media Rumor: Cujo for Lindros; Dunham for Rolston; Federov as FA. My Alternative: Martin Lapointe and Brian Rolston for Robert Petrovicky. The nugget for Boston, obviously, is dumping Lapointe's $5.5 million For the Rangers, the idea is to form an intimidating checking line of Financially, this option adds slightly fewer dollars than the media Lindros, Dunham, Lapointe, Rolston and cap flexibility vs. Ranger-Centric Rumor #2 Media Rumor: Jagr and prospects to NY for Lindros. My Alternative: Jaromir Jagr for Bobby Holik. If Sather is so gung-ho for more offense that he would be willing to I don't agree with trading Holik, but I also don't agree with having Ranger-centric Rumor #3 Media rumor: Federov as a free agent signee for $8 million per. My Alternative: Plug holes with one-year, ufa deals. Defensive defenseman budget: 1 year, $1.5-$2 million dollars. Defensive forward for Holik budget: 1 year, $1.5-$2 million. Versatile Forward with offense budget: 1 year, $1.5-$2 million These alternatives complement our current team, create no post-cap Lindros and Bure could play with Simon. Holik and Lacouture Sather could then use the extra $2-4 million dollars he saved from -Gabe Posted by Gabe at July 11, 2003 04:33 PMeMail this entry! Comments
Hey Gabe, Try "Ronald Petrovicky" and, not going to happen. While Petro works his ass off, he was like -12 last season. B's ain't gonna buy that. Besides in Rumour No 2 your getting rid of Holik for Jagr negating Rumour No 1. Besides, I'm about to order a No 38 Jersey. Posted by: mhurley on July 11, 2003 05:55 PMI'd like to say the typo for Petro isn't a big deal, but truth be known I hate when I make those mistakes. Bah. As for the Boston "rumor," Boston's primary (only) reason to do the deal would be to free up Lapointe's salary in order to go after Cujo. They could offer another salary dump on Detroit in that deal. Petro is filler. But don't worry. I think it's safe to get your 38 jersey. (And, to answer your other question, the three rumors are indedepent of each other.) -Gabe Posted by: Gabe on July 11, 2003 06:14 PMHey Gabe, Robert still plays back in Slovakia. He ain't half bad either from what I hear from a Slovak buddy. Time for another Brother tandem for the Rangers. It's been a long time since the Maloneys. Upon reflection, I think young Petro is safe, too. He was a coup for Sather last year and is his poster boy for hard work. Besides, it was fun to see him piss off Nedved with that misguided Check, no pun intended. Posted by: mhurley on July 11, 2003 07:08 PMFunny, in my mind Petro was the minor part of this column. But since you bring it up ... I think Petro's a good player, but he rode a good first impression a long ways. The rationale for using Petro in the Boston "rumor" is because I believe Lacouture is a better and more complete player, and with Lapointe and Rolston "arriving," and kids like Garth Murray close to ready, it made sense to send a gritty guy the other way. -Gabe Posted by: Gabe on July 11, 2003 10:07 PMGREG DE VRIES, GABE!!! GREG DE VRIES!!! OHHH YEAH! Posted by: Some Random Stranger on July 12, 2003 04:08 PMPost a comment
|
|
![]()
| ||||