Home
The Hockey Rodent
Rangerland
Messageboard
Birdcage
Archives
Buy Hockeybird Stuff !

RSS Feed

Podcast




Rocky and Bullwinkle
Saturday - September 20, 2003

Ah, the fall pre-season.

It's a time when Vorobiev can be the next Kovalev;

when horse meat can turn a playmaker into a power forward;

and when ice time is spread out over four lines.

But there's a formula here, folks ...

[Insert Prospect Name Here]

Every year, an 18-year old prospect is 'on the bubble' of
making the team before before returning to juniors. And a
year later, they somehow regress and slide down the prospect slide.

Filip Novak 'almost' made it as an 18-year old, then looked
out of place the following training camp and was sent in
a trade for Pavel Bure that season.

Let's hope Tjutin's so-far disappointing camp, after 'almost'
making the team last season, doesn't lead him to the same fate.

But the reality is that over the past few years, three of which under
the Sather tenure, young players such as Malhotra, Brendl, Heisten,
Mottau, Kloucek, Smrek and others have been on the NY prospect ride.

And if Dominic Moore was smart enough to go to Harvard, you can bet
he did well on reading comprehension, which means the normal path
for prospects isn't lost on him .. or the others.

Which Makes Lundmark Important with a Capital "I"

Out of all the young players in camp, Lundmark has the only realistic
chance of earning a significant spot on the roster.

And by significant I mean top-nine forward or top-four defenseman.
Not a fourth line center spot and frequent flyer miles on the
Hartford shuttle.

Without Lundmark, there will not be one player on the Rangers roster
who went the Ranger development path through Hartford.

This can't be overstated. For Sather's development program to finally
deliver results, young players need to believe that sacrifice and
hard work is rewarded.

Players like Garth Murray, Fedor Tjutin, Dominic Moore, and others
need to see a flag bearer who can prop them up when their prospect
ratings fluctuate through their development.

Lundmark Needs Holik

A fourth line role does not fit Lundmark. He's developing into a two-
way forward, not a momentum changing energy player.

The first two lines are set with no opportunity for Jamie.

But Jamie's got first dibs at Holik's flank, and it's a tantalizing
opportunity.

In New Jersey, Holik opened up ice for Scott Gomez to play some of
the best hockey of his career.

There is reason to believe, from their play together last year in
pre-season, that the same formula for success can happen here.

And Holik speaks glowingly of Lundmark in quotes in the NY Post:

"I've said many times that I enjoy playing with Jamie and that I
think we're a good complement for one another. He has great skills,
a great shot, very good speed and quickness, he understands how to
get open in the offensive zone, and he plays the same give-and-go game
that I do."

The Rocky and Bullwinkle Show!

Among some fans, Holik has a nickname of Rocky. If that's the
case, then Lundmark must be Bullwinkle.

There is so much opportunity here if they are successful.

For the present, it would complete the top three lines and deliver
consistency to the lineup that hasn't been seen in years.

And for the future, Lundmark would give hope to players in Hartford
that the ups-and-downs of development in the Rangers system can
lead to a significant and lucrative role on Broadway.

Let's keep our fingers crossed ...

-Gabe

Posted by Gabe at September 20, 2003 07:50 AM
eMail this entry!
Comments

While I agree with the context of what you are saying there is one small error in your article.

Dale Purinton would be the other Ranger on the roster who was developed via Hartford.

If you really want to be depressed about the state of Ranger home grown talent on the roster then realize that Jaime (1999), Purinton (1995) and Kovalev (1994) and Leetch (1986) will be the only home grown Rangers on the roster.

Posted by: Jess on September 21, 2003 02:45 AM

Hey Jess -

Though I phrased it poorly, the context of no one with Hartford development meant a significant role. Purinton has no chance as a top-4 defensemen, he's a 6-7.

It's a funny fork in the road right now. If Lundmark makes it, he could be followed by a slew of prospects ... Moore, Murray, Tjutin, Staals, etc.

If he doesn't, then as you write, we're still talking about 30+ year olds like Kovalev and Leetch as our home grown talent.

-Gabe

Posted by: Gabe on September 21, 2003 10:13 AM

Gabe to me any player who works his way from the ECHL all the way to the NHL especially considering that he is coming through the Ranger (cough, cough) developmental system as Purinton has done deserves some credit and even a tiny bit of respect.

People keep saying that all Purinton will ever be is a 6-7 defensemen but I think there remains a chance from him to still improve his game. We are talking about a player who every off-season has taken it upon himself to bust his butt to improve himself not to mention how he has in fact improve every season of his pro career.

Posted by: Jess on September 21, 2003 11:42 PM

I agree not only that Dale deserves respect, but that his current level of play could see him as more than a 6-7 defenseman.

But the point was that Dale has no chance of cracking a 'significant' spot in the lineup, which would mean a top-4 defense spot. No kid has a chance of landing a significant role but Lundmark, which is why I think Jamie's success this season has implications for the entire development program.

Posted by: Gabe on September 22, 2003 10:04 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


Comments:






Hockeybird Store !


 
Web Hockeybird.com