![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
||||
|
|
|
![]() |
|
||||
|
|
Rocky and Bullwinkle
Saturday - September 20, 2003
Ah, the fall pre-season. It's a time when Vorobiev can be the next Kovalev; when horse meat can turn a playmaker into a power forward; and when ice time is spread out over four lines. But there's a formula here, folks ... [Insert Prospect Name Here] Every year, an 18-year old prospect is 'on the bubble' of Filip Novak 'almost' made it as an 18-year old, then looked Let's hope Tjutin's so-far disappointing camp, after 'almost' But the reality is that over the past few years, three of which under And if Dominic Moore was smart enough to go to Harvard, you can bet Which Makes Lundmark Important with a Capital "I" Out of all the young players in camp, Lundmark has the only realistic And by significant I mean top-nine forward or top-four defenseman. Without Lundmark, there will not be one player on the Rangers roster This can't be overstated. For Sather's development program to finally Players like Garth Murray, Fedor Tjutin, Dominic Moore, and others Lundmark Needs Holik A fourth line role does not fit Lundmark. He's developing into a two- The first two lines are set with no opportunity for Jamie. But Jamie's got first dibs at Holik's flank, and it's a tantalizing In New Jersey, Holik opened up ice for Scott Gomez to play some of There is reason to believe, from their play together last year in And Holik speaks glowingly of Lundmark in quotes in the NY Post: "I've said many times that I enjoy playing with Jamie and that I The Rocky and Bullwinkle Show! Among some fans, Holik has a nickname of Rocky. If that's the There is so much opportunity here if they are successful. For the present, it would complete the top three lines and deliver And for the future, Lundmark would give hope to players in Hartford Let's keep our fingers crossed ... -Gabe Posted by Gabe at September 20, 2003 07:50 AMeMail this entry! Comments
While I agree with the context of what you are saying there is one small error in your article. Dale Purinton would be the other Ranger on the roster who was developed via Hartford. If you really want to be depressed about the state of Ranger home grown talent on the roster then realize that Jaime (1999), Purinton (1995) and Kovalev (1994) and Leetch (1986) will be the only home grown Rangers on the roster. Posted by: Jess on September 21, 2003 02:45 AMHey Jess - Though I phrased it poorly, the context of no one with Hartford development meant a significant role. Purinton has no chance as a top-4 defensemen, he's a 6-7. It's a funny fork in the road right now. If Lundmark makes it, he could be followed by a slew of prospects ... Moore, Murray, Tjutin, Staals, etc. If he doesn't, then as you write, we're still talking about 30+ year olds like Kovalev and Leetch as our home grown talent. -Gabe Posted by: Gabe on September 21, 2003 10:13 AMGabe to me any player who works his way from the ECHL all the way to the NHL especially considering that he is coming through the Ranger (cough, cough) developmental system as Purinton has done deserves some credit and even a tiny bit of respect. People keep saying that all Purinton will ever be is a 6-7 defensemen but I think there remains a chance from him to still improve his game. We are talking about a player who every off-season has taken it upon himself to bust his butt to improve himself not to mention how he has in fact improve every season of his pro career. Posted by: Jess on September 21, 2003 11:42 PMI agree not only that Dale deserves respect, but that his current level of play could see him as more than a 6-7 defenseman. But the point was that Dale has no chance of cracking a 'significant' spot in the lineup, which would mean a top-4 defense spot. No kid has a chance of landing a significant role but Lundmark, which is why I think Jamie's success this season has implications for the entire development program. Posted by: Gabe on September 22, 2003 10:04 PMPost a comment
|
|
![]()
| ||||